j.laur5

Recently I watched Morag final episode in 1989 and Celia was not in episode and so did Celia and Morag leave on good terms or bad terms?.

Why do you say that?

But Ross was a bad person and I think of all the people Colby saved. Ross was the type to kill any decent human being. Charlotte was the same and if Josh hadn’t killed Charlotte when he did then half the characters would be dead by now. Charlotte would have kept on killing people and she would even have killed her own son Hunter once he turned against her. Gunno even called Charlotte a piece of work and at least Gunno only went after enemies and I thought Gunno was still not a good person by any means.

Ross was even worse than Charlotte so I hardly think Colby killing Ross is worse than Josh killing Charlotte as both Ross and Charlotte deserved to die.

I just can’t imagine Colby being in bi storyline and can even imagine Dean more in bi storyline then Colby.

I must say I much preferred 2000's Morag to 80s Morag as I felt 80s Morag was a bit over top in her nasty mouth for someone who was supposed to be an intelligent woman and high court judge. Not saying that just because you're an intelligent person that you're nice. But I just mean in real life anyone would think Morag was not cut out to be a judge if she was being that over the top nasty and lot of her words were not really coming from someone who was supposed to be an intelligent woman. Morag we had in 2000s was far more intelligent with her words and put downs and normally it was to someone that deserved to be put down. That's why I think Morag was shown more once she mellowed as there was to do with her character as when they kept her nasty there was limited to what could do with her character by being cut off with everyone.

I have noticed many people have posted they preferred to had Floss then Colleen and i am one of those people as long as didit turn Floss into busybody or towns laughing stock as Floss was never busy-body like Celia and Colleen and was without doubt definitely more down to earth then Colleen and Celia.

Always had the impression that she was only brought back so Alf could have a family member to talk to. It's the same with Martha I think she just bought form dead just so Ruth and Alf have excuse to leave when Ray or Georgia taking time off and same with Karl on Neighbours as believe they created Holly as excuse for Karl to leave as Alan wants time off.

Also what happened to Marilyn parents? That storyline never seemed to make sense as there were two sets of parents and Marilyn never mentioned either parents again.

Why were they thinking of writing out Irene in 2002? I think it very bizarre since she had Nick and Hayley at that point and she had been around for almost ten years. With both Donald and Shelley leaving around that time you'd think they wouldn't want to lose any more older characters, and if any you'd think Colleen would be dropped before Irene. Does anyone have any insight on this?

I wouldn’t say that, but its probably not as simple as it sounds to kill off a character off screen .

Funny thing is Morag is not even mentioned anymore!. Don’t mean to be blunt but why won’t they kill Morag off screen as it’s unrealistic for her to never appear again!.

But it didn’t really go anywhere!.

Lou in 2009.

Having been to Sydney few times it makes me love H&A even more.

Since Ruth be back she really has felt like sidelined character and not fitting in anymore. I really like Ruth but now started feel character perhaps run her course. I know people say same thing about Leah/Irene/Marilyn but at least they have strong presence in community and Leah getting storyline with Justin and Marilyn paired with John and has Jett storyline and Irene being mother figure with Bella and Jasmine and Willow. Wheres Ruth with she is just has nothing going on anymore other then being other teacher at school and she is not even being proper gundain to Ryder and Ruth already left several times leaving Ryder to be taking care of by Leah. Leah might trusted person but Ruth should not be leaving wherever she pleases as Ryder surpose to be in Ruth care not Leah’s.

Her mum just drop her on her grandma Joyce doorstep when she was child.

Would anyone like it if H&A filmed more aroud Sydney?. I think it be nice if got to see more of Sydney on H&A as just think it add bit more realism to show. I like how in recent years them mentioned Sydney instead of City as remember Ben when first saying to Justin at beach you have no idea how long it takes drive to good beach in Sydney and Tori mention to Nate you apply for Job in Sydney. Thoughts?.

I said lighthearted meaning not as dark storylines and Braxtons were not killers as Casey killing Danny was in self defence.

Irene is such a judgmental, interfering, self-righteous busybody at the moment. Poor Lynne McGranger, the PTB just don’t seemed to know how to write Irene . I love Lynne but Irene the character has just gone downhill in the last few years. I think it might be a good idea if Lynne decided to take a few months break.

Martin and Lance are early days more lighthearted Braxtons.

I disagree, I think Colby/Dean/Jasmine/Willow are most likeable characters in long while.

But I think deep down Morag didn’t hold it against Bobby wrecking Ruth's dress after finding out she was using Frank and the baby was not hers . Even thought Morag would never admittedly say Bobby was right and Ruth was wrong. I think even 80s Morag had moral ground .

Before they knew they were mother and daughter, at Alan's will reading Morag was civil towards Bobby when reading her what Alan had left her.

Poor Lynne as writers just don’t seemed to know how to write Irene as when she first return it look like she likeable again and now they seemed to be turning her into new Colleen Smart. Why cant they write Irene character good anymore?.